The Crime of Sylvestre Bonnard — Context and Discussion

(0 User reviews) 885

In Category - Utopias Future Societies Other Worlds

Authors: France, Anatole, 1844-1924 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2000 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Detective and mystery stories; France -- Fiction; Book collectors -- Fiction Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 73,874

Reading time 322 min

Text sections 9

Before opening The Crime of Sylvestre Bonnard — Context and Discussion, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 73,874 words, 5 hr 22 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 19.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Detective and mystery stories,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #2123

Anatole France's novel follows elderly scholar Sylvestre Bonnard through diary entries and letters, blending book collecting, legal guardianship, and a mysterious crime. The excerpts reveal a narrator who addresses his cat Hamilcar in mock-heroic style, confronts the cunning notary Maître Mouche, and navigates the care of an orphan named Jeanne.

Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg2123

Read the Text

Hamilcar was lying in front of the andirons, curled up on a cushion, with his nose between his paws. His think find fur rose and fell with his regular breathing. At my coming, he slowly slipped a glance of his agate eyes at me from between his half-opened lids, which he closed again almost at once, thinking to himself, “It is nothing; it is only my friend.”

“Hamilcar,” I said to him, as I stretched my legs--“Hamilcar, somnolent Prince of the City of Books--thou guardian nocturnal! Like that Divine Cat who combated the impious in Heliopolis--in the night of the great combat--thou dost defend from vile nibblers those books which the old savant acquired at the cost of his slender savings and indefatigable zeal. Sleep, Hamilcar, softly as a sultana, in this library, that shelters thy military virtues; for verily in thy person are united the formidable aspect of a Tatar warrior and the slumbrous grace of a woman of the Orient. Sleep, thou heroic and voluptuous Hamilcar, while awaiting the moonlight hour in which the mice will come forth to dance before the Acta Sanctorum of the learned Bolandists!”

The beginning of this discourse pleased Hamilcar, who accompanied it with a throat-sound like the song of a kettle on the fire. But as my voice waxed louder, Hamilcar notified me by lowering his ears and by wrinkling the striped skin of his brow that it was bad taste on my part so to declaim.

“This old-book man,” evidently thought Hamilcar, “talks to no purpose at all while our housekeeper never utters a word which is not full of good sense, full of significance--containing either the announcement of a meal or the promise of a whipping. One knows what she says. But this old man puts together a lot of sounds signifying nothing.”

So thought Hamilcar to himself. Leaving him to his reflections, I opened a book, which I began to read with interest; for it was a catalogue of manuscripts. I do not know any reading more easy, more fascinating, more delightful than that of a catalogue. The one which I was reading--edited in 1824 by Mr. Thompson, librarian to Sir Thomas Raleigh--sins, it is true, by excess of brevity, and does not offer that character of exactitude which the archivists of my own generation were the first to introduce into works upon diplomatics and paleography. It leaves a good deal to be desired and to be divined. This is perhaps why I find myself aware, while reading it, of a state of mind which in nature more imaginative than mine might be called reverie. I had allowed myself to drift away this gently upon the current of my thoughts, when my housekeeper announced, in a tone of ill-humor, that Monsieur Coccoz desired to speak with me.

In fact, some one had slipped into the library after her. He was a little man--a poor little man of puny appearance, wearing a thin jacket. He approached me with a number of little bows and smiles. But he was very pale, and, although still young and alert, he looked ill. I thought as I looked at him, of a wounded squirrel. He carried under his arm a green toilette, which he put upon a chair; then unfastening the four corners of the toilette, he uncovered a heap of little yellow books.

“Monsieur,” he then said to me, “I have not the honour to be known to you. I am a book-agent, Monsieur. I represent the leading houses of the capital, and in the hope that you will kindly honour me with your confidence, I take the liberty to offer you a few novelties.”

Kind gods! just gods! such novelties as the homunculus Coccoz showed me! The first volume that he put in my hand was “L’Histoire de la Tour de Nesle,” with the amours of Marguerite de Bourgogne and the Captain Buridan.

“It is a historical book,” he said to me, with a smile--“a book of real history.”

“In that case,” I replied, “it must be very tiresome; for all the historical books which contain no lies are extremely tedious. I write some authentic ones myself; and if you were unlucky enough to carry a copy of any of them from door to door you would run the risk of keeping it all your life in that green baize of yours, without ever finding even a cook foolish enough to buy it from you.”

“Certainly Monsieur,” the little man answered, out of pure good-nature.

And, all smiling again, he offered me the “Amours d’Heloise et d’Abeilard”; but I made him understand that, at my age, I had no use for love-stories.

Continue Reading →

The first excerpt introduces Sylvestre Bonnard in his study on a winter evening, addressing his cat Hamilcar as "somnolent Prince of the City of Books." The narrator's voice is ornate and self-mocking, mixing scholarly references with domestic detail. He describes ice-crystals on the windowpanes and a fire in the chimney, establishing a setting of cozy isolation. The cat's reactions—a throat-sound like a kettle, then lowered ears—are interpreted by Bonnard as judgments on his own loquacity. This opening immediately signals a narrator who anthropomorphizes his pet and treats his library as a kingdom, setting the tone for a story that blends erudition with whimsy.

The Narrator's Voice and the Cat

The opening pages establish Bonnard's distinctive voice through his address to Hamilcar. He calls the cat "thou guardian nocturnal" and compares him to "that Divine Cat who combated the impious in Heliopolis." The mock-heroic register is sustained by references to the Acta Sanctorum and the Bolandists, revealing Bonnard's scholarly habits. Yet the cat's reaction—lowering his ears and wrinkling his brow—prompts Bonnard to reflect that his housekeeper "never utters a word which is not full of good sense." This self-awareness undercuts the grandiloquence, suggesting that Bonnard knows he talks to no purpose. The passage also introduces the library as a central space, with Hamilcar defending books from "vile nibblers." Readers should note how the narrator's relationship with his cat mirrors his broader interactions: he projects meaning onto silence and seeks companionship in a solitary life.

The Orphan and the Guardian

Later excerpts shift to Bonnard's involvement with Jeanne Alexandre, an orphan. Madame de Gabry informs him that Jeanne has a guardian, Maître Mouche, a notary at Levallois-Perret. Bonnard's naivety is evident when he exclaims, "I had not the least idea in the world that Jeanne had a guardian!" Madame de Gabry's response—"I am afraid you will not be able to come to any understanding with him; for he is a very serious person"—is met with Bonnard's literal-minded reply: "with what kind of people can you expect me to have any sort of understanding at my age, except serious persons." This exchange highlights Bonnard's unworldliness. When he meets Maître Mouche, the description is precise: "Small, thin, and dry; his complexion looks as if it was made out of the dust of his pigeon-holes." The notary speaks in "choice phrases" but watches "slyly out of the corner of his eye." Bonnard's observations are sharp, yet he remains oblivious to the implications of Mouche's cunning.

The Boarding School Visit

Bonnard's visit to Mademoiselle Préféré's school is rendered with sensory detail. The establishment is identified by "a big sign, painted with blue letters," which Bonnard takes as "the first indication of Mademoiselle Préféré's character." Inside, a "scared-looking servant" takes his card and abandons him in a "chilly parlour full of that stale odour peculiar to the dining-rooms of educational establishments." The floor has been waxed "with such pitiless energy" that Bonnard must step on strips of woollen carpet to cross it. These details build a picture of a joyless institution. The permit to visit Jeanne, obtained from Maître Mouche, is described as "in due form"—a phrase Bonnard repeats with a hint of irony. The visit is restricted to the first Thursday of each month, suggesting the guardian's control. Readers should attend to how Bonnard's perceptions of people and places are filtered through his scholarly sensibility, often missing the darker undertones.

Structure and Temporal Shifts

The text is divided into two parts: "The Log" and "The Daughter of Clementine." The first part consists of dated entries from December 24, 1849, to December 8, 1859, spanning a decade. The second part includes chapter headings and dates from April 16 to August 21, 1869. This structure suggests a narrative that moves from a personal journal to a more novelistic form. The excerpts show Bonnard's voice remaining consistent across years, but the concerns shift from book collecting to the care of Jeanne. The title "The Crime of Sylvestre Bonnard" hints at a transgression, yet the excerpts do not reveal what crime occurs. Readers should note that the narrative unfolds through Bonnard's limited perspective, and the gaps between entries may conceal key events. The dated format invites attention to what is omitted as much as what is recorded.

These excerpts present a narrator who is both perceptive and naive, a scholar whose love of books and language sometimes blinds him to human realities. The contrast between Bonnard's ornate inner world and the mundane deceptions of Maître Mouche or Mademoiselle Préféré creates a tension that drives the story. As you read, pay attention to how Bonnard's diary entries reveal his character through what he notices—and what he fails to notice. The crime of the title may be less a legal offense than a moral or emotional one, emerging from the collision between his ideals and the world's compromises.

Old Bonnard, you know, loved his books the way one loves old friends—quietly, without fuss. He found a similar pulse in The Torrents of Spring — A Reader’s Guide, where a restless heart, much like his own, learns that tenderness often arrives unannounced, wearing a plain coat. Strange, how one memory can shelter another, page beside page.