Death of a hero — Themes and Context

(0 User reviews)   40
Aldington, Richard, 1892-1962 Project Gutenberg 2025 Not confirmed
World War, 1914-1918 -- Fiction; War stories Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 129,219
Reading time 562 min
Text sections 17

For Death of a hero — Themes and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 129,219 words, 9 hr 22 min estimated reading time, and 17 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 15.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “World War, 1914-1918 -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Richard Aldington's 1929 novel uses a fractured, jazz-influenced style to trace a generation's disillusionment before and during World War I, blending satire of Edwardian mores with a self-described 'anti-novel' structure.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

e got his life into would have baffled an army of psychologists to unravel.

When I told Winterbourne what I thought of his father, he admitted it was mostly true. But he rather liked the man, probably disarmed by the mildness, and not sufficiently hard to his father’s soft selfish sentimentality. Possibly old Winterbourne would have felt and have acted differently in his reactions to George’s death, if circumstances had been different. But he was so scared by the war, so unable to adjust himself to a harsh intruding reality—he had spent his life avoiding realities—that he took refuge in a drivelling religiosity. He got to know some rather slimy Roman Catholics, and read the slimy religious tracts they showered on him, and talked and sobbed to the exceedingly slimy priest they found for him. So about the middle of the war he was “received,” and found—let us hope—comfort in much prayer and Mass-going and writing rules for Future Conduct and rather suspecting he was like François de Sales and praying for the beatification of the super-slimy Thérèse of Lisieux.

Old Winterbourne was in London, “doing war work,” when the news of George’s death came. He would never have done anything so positive and energetic if he had not been nagged and goaded into it by his wife. She was animated less by motives of disinterested patriotism than by exasperation with him for existing at all and for interrupting her love affairs. Old Winterbourne always said with proud sad dignity that his “religious convictions forbade” him to divorce her. Religious convictions are such an easy excuse for being nasty. So she found a war job for him in London, and put him into a position where it was impossible for him to refuse.

The telegram from the War Office—“Regret to inform... killed in action.... Their Majesties’ sympathy....”—went to the home address in the country, and was opened by Mrs. Winterbourne. Such an excitement for her, almost a pleasant change, for it was pretty dull in the country just before the Armistice. She was sitting by the fire, yawning over her twenty-second lover—the affair had lasted nearly a year—when the servant brought the telegram. It was addressed to Mr. Winterbourne, but, of course, she opened it; she had an idea that “one of _those_ women” was “after” her husband; who, however, was regrettably chaste, from cowardice.

Mrs. Winterbourne liked drama in private life. She uttered a most creditable shriek, clasped both hands to her rather soggy bosom, and pretended to faint. The lover, one of those nice clean sporting Englishmen with a minimum of intelligence and an infinite capacity for being gulled by females, especially the clean English sort, clutched her unwillingly and automatically but with quite an Ethel M. Dell appearance of emotion, and exclaimed:

“Darling, what is it? Has _he_ insulted you again?”

Poor old Winterbourne was incapable of insulting any one, but it was a convention always established between Mrs. Winterbourne and her lovers that Winterbourne had “insulted” her, when his worst taunt had been to pray earnestly for her conversion to the True Faith, along with the rest of “poor misguided England.”

In low moaning tones, founded on the best tradition of sensational fiction, Mrs. Winterbourne feebly ejaculated:

“Who’s dead? Winterbourne?”

(Some apprehension perhaps in the attendant Sam Browne—he would have to propose, of course, and might be accepted.)

“They’ve killed him, those vile, _filthy_ foreigners. My _baby_ son.”

Sam Browne, still mystified, read the telegram. He then stood to attention, saluted (although not wearing a cap) and said solemnly:

“A clean sportin’ death, an _Englishman’s_ death.”

When Huns were killed it was neither clean nor sportin’, but served the beggars—(“buggers,” among men)—right.

The tears Mrs. Winterbourne shed were not very natural, but they did not take long to dry. Dramatically, she ran to the telephone. Dramatically, she called to the local exchange:

“Trrrunks. (Sob.) Give me Kensington 1030. Mr. Winterbourne’s number, you know. (Sob.) Our _darling_ son—Captain Winterbourne,—has been killed by those (sob) beasts. (Sob. Pause.) Oh, thank you _so_ much, Mr. Crump, I _knew_ you would feel for us in our trouble. (Sob. Sob.) But the blow is so sudden. I _must_ speak to Mr. Winterbourne. Our hearts are _breaking_ here. (Sobissimo.) Thank you. I’ll wait till you ring me.”

Mrs. Winterbourne’s effort on the telephone to her husband was not unworthy of her:

Richard Aldington's Death of a Hero opens with a prefatory letter to Halcott Glover that announces its own formal rebellion: 'the excuse for the novel is that one can do any damn thing one pleases.' Aldington describes the book as a 'jazz novel,' a term he previously applied to his poem 'A Fool i' th' Forest,' and warns that it 'is not the work of a professional novelist.' The catalog subjects list it as a war story and historical fiction, but the excerpts reveal a narrative that spends considerable time on pre-war domestic and sexual politics before reaching any battlefield. The extended passage about George and Elizabeth's marriage—their 'Triumphal Scheme' of separate studios and the false pregnancy scare—shows Aldington's satirical eye trained on Edwardian bohemianism, not yet on the trenches.

A Jazz Novel's Formal Disregard

Aldington's preface explicitly rejects 'immutable laws' of novelistic form, comparing his technique to introducing asides and soliloquies into a play. He claims to have evolved this method from his poem 'A Fool i' th' Forest,' which some called 'jazz poetry.' The excerpts bear this out: the narrator frequently breaks into direct commentary, as when he describes Elizabeth's mental maneuvers as 'ludicrous' and compares her argument retreat to a military 'Hindenburg line.' The prose shifts between sardonic summary and sudden, sharp detail—the 'odious word' kiddies, the 'smug beatitude' of contemplating an insurance document. This is not a conventional realist novel but a deliberately fractured performance, one that treats the reader as a confidant rather than a passive observer.

Marriage as Satirical Battlefield

The longest excerpt details George and Elizabeth's courtship and marriage, a sequence that reads as a sustained satire of bohemian pretensions. Elizabeth's 'Triumphal Scheme' of Complete Sexual Freedom collapses overnight into a demand for 'Safety First, Female Honour, and Legal Marriage'—a retreat Aldington renders in mock-military language. The narrator insists neither George nor Elizabeth is 'the marrying sort'; they are 'adventurers in life, not good citizens.' Yet the legal marriage changes nothing outwardly: they keep separate studios, meet on 'terms of affectionate sensuality,' and avoid the 'domestic den atmosphere.' The false pregnancy plot twist—Elizabeth is not pregnant at all—underscores the farce. Aldington's tone is coolly contemptuous, but the precision of his observations (the 'modest working-class matron' calling it 'expecting') keeps the satire grounded in specific social codes.

The War as Absent Center

Despite the catalog classification as a World War I novel, the excerpts contain no combat scenes. The war appears only as a framing device: Aldington's preface mentions beginning the book 'almost immediately after the Armistice, in a little Belgian cottage' and notes that 'a great number of the men of our generation died prematurely.' The title itself promises a death, but the surviving text focuses on the pre-war world that produced the hero. This gap between subject and content is deliberate. Aldington's satire of Edwardian sexual hypocrisy and artistic posturing implies that the war is the logical endpoint of a culture he finds hollow. The reader is left to infer how the 'jazz novel' form—disjointed, ironic, self-aware—might render the actual experience of war, but the excerpts do not show it. The book's structure, as presented, is one of deferral.

The excerpts from Death of a Hero reveal a work more interested in the social and sexual hypocrisies of pre-war England than in the war itself—at least in its opening sections. Aldington's 'jazz novel' technique, with its asides and direct addresses, invites the reader to treat the narrative as a performance rather than a transparent window. Readers should approach the book expecting a satirical, formally experimental work that may not conform to the war-novel expectations set by its catalog subjects. The relationship between the title's promise and the text's actual focus is itself a central tension.

I often find myself pondering how Death of a Hero holds its fractured jazz rhythm, a bitter tune of wasted youth. It whispers of steps taken toward a precipice, of grand illusions crumbling. This quiet kinship surfaces when I consider The Duke of York's steps — Story, Setting & Ideas, wondering if its own cadence echoes that same lonely march. A gentle, sorrowful duet across the years, I think.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Take a moment to reflect on this book

Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks