The Princess De Montpensier — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews) 286

In Category - Exploration Survival Adventure Tales

Authors: La Fayette, Madame de (Marie-Madeleine Pioche de La Vergne), 1634-1693 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2000 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Princesses -- Fiction; France -- History -- 16th century -- Fiction Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 13,960

Reading time 61 min

Text sections 2

The Princess De Montpensier — A Closer Reading can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 13,960 words, 1 hr 1 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 29.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Man-woman relationships -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #2365

An editorial note on the structure and recurring imagery in Madame de La Fayette's 1662 novella, focusing on the movement between private and public spaces, the use of mistaken identity, and the role of the confidant as a structural pivot.

Editorial Edition Score 4.4/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg2365

Read the Text

is was how the matter stood when the ruling house of Bourbon, who could not bear to see any benefit accruing to that of de Guise, decided to step in and reap the profit themselves by marrying this heiress to the Prince de Montpensier.

This project was pursued with such vigour that the parents of Mlle. de Mézières, despite the promises given to the Cardinal de Lorraine, resolved to give her in marriage to the young Prince. The house of de Guise was much displeased at this, but the Duc himself was overcome by grief, and regarded this as an insupportable affront. In spite of warnings from his uncles, the Cardinal and the Duc de Aumale--who did not wish to stand in the way of something which they could not prevent--he expressed himself with so much violence, even in the presence of the Prince de Montpensier, that a mutual enmity arose between them which lasted all their lives.

Mlle. de Mézières, urged by her parents to marry the Prince, realised that it was impossible for her to marry the Duc de Guise, and that if she married his brother, the Duc de Maine, she would be in the dangerous position of having as a brother-in-law a man whom she wished was her husband; so she agreed finally to marry the Prince and begged the Duc de Guise not to continue to place any obstacle in the way.

The marriage having taken place, the Prince de Montpensier took her off to his estate of Champigny, which was where Princes of his family usually lived, in order to remove her from Paris, where it seemed that an outbreak of fighting was imminent: this great city being under threat of siege by a Huguenot army led by the Prince de Condé, who had once more declared war on the King.

The Prince de Montpensier had, when a very young man, formed a close friendship with the Comte de Chabannes, a man considerably older than himself and of exemplary character. The Comte in turn had been so much influenced by the esteem and friendship of the Prince that he had broken off influential connections which he had with the Prince de Condé, and had declared for the Catholics; a change of sides which, having no other foundation, was regarded with suspicion: so much so that the Queen Mother, Catherine de Medici, on the declaration of war by the Huguenots, proposed to have him imprisoned. The Prince de Montpensier prevented this and carried him away to Champigny when he went there with his wife. The Comte being a very pleasant, amiable man soon gained the approbation of the Princess and before long she regarded him with as much friendship and confidence as did her husband. Chabannes, for his part, observed with admiration the beauty, sense and modesty of the young Princess, and used what influence he had to instill in her thoughts and behaviour suited to her elevated position; so that under his guidance she became one of the most accomplished women of her time.

The Prince having gone back to the Court, where he was needed owing to the continuation of the war, the Comte lived alone with the Princess and continued to treat her with the respect due to her rank and position. The Princess took him so far into her confidence as to tell him of the feelings she had once had for the Duc de Guise, but she intimated that there remained only enough of this emotion to prevent her heart from straying elsewhere and that this remnant, together with her wifely virtue made it impossible for her to respond, except with a rebuff, to any possible suitor.

The Comte who recognised her sincerity and who saw in her a character wholly opposed to flirtation and gallantry, did not doubt the truth of her words; but nevertheless he was unable to resist all the charms which he saw daily so close to him. He fell deeply in love with the Princess, in spite of the shame he felt at allowing himself to be overcome by this illicit passion. However although not master of his heart, he was master of his actions; the change in his emotions did not show at all in his behaviour, and no one suspected him. He took, for a whole year, scrupulous care to hide his feelings from the Princess and believed that he would always be able to do so.

Continue Reading →

Madame de La Fayette's The Princess De Montpensier (1662) moves its characters through a tight circuit of rooms, gardens, and courtly gatherings, each shift in setting marking a change in the balance of power. The story's architecture relies on a series of private audiences—tête-à-têtes in a sister's house, a farewell in a chamber—that are constantly interrupted by the arrival of a mother-in-law, a husband, or a servant. These interruptions are not merely plot devices; they structure the narrative's rhythm, creating a pattern of approach and withdrawal that mirrors the characters' emotional states.

The Confidant as Structural Pivot

The Comte de Chabannes occupies a peculiar structural role: he is the character through whom secrets pass, yet he is consistently excluded from the central romantic dyad. When the Princess needs a go-between to write to the Duc de Guise, she turns to Chabannes, “whom she always looked on as a friend without considering that he was in love with her.” This oversight is not just ironic; it creates a narrative triangle where the confidant's loyalty is taken for granted. Chabannes's function is to receive confidences and carry messages, but his own desires remain unvoiced, making him a silent pivot around which the plot turns. His presence allows the author to reveal the Princess's thoughts without direct interior monologue, while his emotional isolation underscores the asymmetry of the relationships.

Mistaken Identity and the Limits of Sight

A key scene hinges on a visual error: at a ball, the Princess mistakes the Duc d'Anjou for the Duc de Guise because of “the resemblance of the costumes.” This mistake drives the central misunderstanding—she accuses Guise of betraying her secret, only to discover she herself revealed it to the wrong man. The episode is a microcosm of the novella's concern with perception. Characters constantly misread glances, gestures, and words. The Princess “could not refuse her heart to a man who had possessed it in the past,” suggesting that memory and desire distort present judgment. La Fayette uses the costume mix-up to show how easily love and suspicion can be misdirected, and how the courtly setting, with its elaborate disguises and performances, makes true recognition nearly impossible.

Movement Between Court and Country

The narrative shuttles between Paris, Blois, and the provincial estate of Champigny. Each location carries a distinct emotional weight. The court is a space of public performance and political maneuvering—marriages are arranged, favors are granted or withdrawn. Champigny, where the Prince orders his wife to go, is a place of enforced isolation, a “great shock” to the Princess. The journey itself becomes a marker of power: the husband's command to leave court is an assertion of control. Yet even in retreat, the Princess seeks to maintain correspondence, turning the country house into a site of clandestine communication. The contrast between the crowded, watchful court and the lonely, but potentially freer, countryside structures the characters' choices and constraints.

The Economy of Glances and Gestures

La Fayette's prose is frugal with physical description, but she invests heavily in the language of looks and postures. The Duc de Guise “threw himself at her feet”; the Princess “found a way to say goodbye to the Duc de Guise privately.” These gestures carry the weight of declarations. The narrator reports that the Duc “hoped that love would compensate him for his material loss,” but the text shows this hope through actions rather than words. The Princess's consent to “accept his declaration” is given almost silently, in a scene cut short by an arrival. This economy of expression forces the reader to attend to small signals—a pause, a change of topic, an interruption. The novella's emotional drama unfolds in the gaps between what is said and what is performed.

Readers attentive to the novella's spatial and gestural cues will find a story told as much through architecture and movement as through dialogue. The constant interruptions, the mistaken identities, and the reliance on a silent confidant are not flaws but deliberate structural choices. La Fayette builds tension by withholding resolution, by placing her characters in rooms where they can almost speak freely—and then closing the door.

The way the princess moves between public scrutiny and private longing stayed with me, that quiet ache of being seen but never understood. It reminded me of another kind of hidden story, where assumptions blur identity. There is a similar tenderness in The astounding crime on Torrington Road — Text and Context, how a confession can be mistaken for something else entirely. I keep pondering both.